Writing Task 2: Write essay

The debate surrounding capital punishment, or the death penalty, continues to be a contentious issue. While proponents argue that it serves as a deterrent and provides justice for heinous crimes, opponents assert that it violates human rights and fails to address the root causes of crime. Supporters of capital punishment argue that it acts as a deterrent, preventing potential offenders from committing serious crimes due to the fear of severe consequences. They believe that it serves as a form of retribution and provides closure for victims' families. Additionally, proponents contend that capital punishment is necessary for the most heinous crimes, as it ensures that the perpetrators are permanently removed from society. On the other hand, opponents of capital punishment argue that it violates the fundamental right to life and constitutes cruel and inhumane punishment. They assert that the justice system is fallible, and the risk of executing innocent individuals is too great. Moreover, opponents argue that capital punishment fails to address the underlying causes of crime, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education and rehabilitation. Finding common ground is challenging in this debate. However, an increasing number of countries have abolished capital punishment, opting for alternative forms of punishment that focus on rehabilitation and restorative justice. These alternatives aim to address the root causes of crime while respecting human rights. In conclusion, the question of whether capital punishment should be abolished is a complex and deeply rooted issue. While proponents argue for its deterrent effect and justice for victims, opponents emphasize human rights and the need for more effective and humane alternatives. Continual evaluation and consideration of evidence-based approaches to crime prevention and punishment are essential to foster a just and compassionate society.